Ohio State is in the process of revising websites and program materials to accurately reflect compliance with the law. While this work occurs, language referencing protected class status or other activities prohibited by Ohio Senate Bill 1 may still appear in some places. However, all programs and activities are being administered in compliance with federal and state law.

Beneath Compliance: The Limits of Transnational Private Regulation

Timothy Bartley
March 26, 2013
All Day
Mershon Center for International Security Studies, 1501 Neil Ave., Columbus, OH 43201

Timothy Bartley is Associate Professor of Sociology at The Ohio State University and an affiliate of the Mershon Center. He has research interests in economic sociology, political sociology, globalization, organizations, social movements, labor, and the environment.

He is author of numerous articles and book chapters, and is co-editor of Regulation & Governance, an interdisciplinary, international journal focused on the past, present, and future of industry regulation and the changing character of governance within and across countries. His current research focuses on the implementation of fair labor and sustainable forestry standards in Indonesia and China, the intersection of states and private regulation, and the uses and abuses of "corporate social responsibility" in these settings. He is also doing work on the interactions between social movements and firms, the rise of a timber legality regime, neoliberalism and global rule-making, and the meanings of "political consumerism." He addresses these topics through a variety of methods and with perspectives informed by institutional theory and political economy.

He holds a Ph.D. from the University of Arizona.

Abstract

Global industries are increasingly littered with standards—claiming to promote fair labor conditions, sustainability, community development, and environmental justice around the world. In the past two decades, many NGOs and companies have sought to "push" such standards through global supply chains and use third-party certification to verify compliance. Many scholars have argued that these activities amount to a new way of regulating globalization—one that does not rely on the mobilization or coordination of unwilling or incapacitated states and which, if appropriately structured, can impose meaningful discipline in otherwise unruly industries. But how are these systems of “transnational private regulation” actually put into practice in particular places? To what extent can they actually bypass the state and provide meaningful, alternative sets of rules and enforcement practices? To address these questions, this project compares two fields of transnational private regulation—standards for fair labor and sustainable forestry—and their implementation in two countries—Indonesia and China. In this presentation, I will use the case of sustainable forestry certification in Indonesia to consider why, although a program like the Forest Stewardship Council has far more integrity than initiatives focused on fair labor standards, its influence in the crucial Indonesian setting has been quite circumscribed.