![]() |
Department of Political Science |
Quick Links |
|
|
Research in American Politics (RAP)
Director: This workshop serves as a forum for the presentation of
research by graduate students and faculty in American politics. For graduate
students, RAP is an opportunity to hear and present practice job talks,
dissertation chapters, and conference papers. Occasional RAP sessions will
include research presentations by faculty from Ohio State and other
universities.
Winter 2009 Presentation Schedule March 11, 2009 Abstract: This paper presents a game-theoretic model of belief formation and applies it to the literature on crisis bargaining before war. In most such models, actors' beliefs are assumed to be informational, excluding the possibility that desires motivate beliefs. In this paper, beliefs are both desire-based and optimal given the strategic environment and the anticipatory pleasure an actor enjoys from believing that she will do well in the future. In crisis bargaining, the resulting subjective beliefs are optimistic and can lead to war in settings where information-based beliefs would not. Implications of this model are developed for the literatures on war and the balance of power, the democratic peace, and the security dilemma. Click here for copy of paper
March 18, 2009 Abstract: This paper explores the individual legislative effectiveness of committee chairs. It first establishes empirically that chairs are more effective in the committee they chair and on the chamber floor than other members. Next, it presents three broad theories of legislative politics – distributive, majoritarian, and party influence – and derives hypotheses from each that relate to the individual effectiveness of committee chairs. These hypotheses are tested using data from the 93rd to 105th U.S. House of Representatives, where support for general majoritarian theories is found. Click here for a copy of the paper May 13, 2009 Kyle Kopko, Jeff Budziak, Steve Nawara, Chris Devine, and Sara Bryner will be presenting "Count what you want to count: Motivated perception and challenged ballots" Wednesday, May 13th at 12:00pm as part of the RAP series. Click here for a copy of the paper The abstract is below: Fairness requires that election ballots be counted in an accurate and consistent manner, yet close elections are often decided by hand-recounts that may introduce partisan bias. Using an experimental design, this paper simulates the process of counting disputed ballots during a hand-recount after a close election. Applying psychological theories of motivated perception to the political process, we find that ballot assessment often hinges on the individual’s party identification and the personal stake that they have in the outcome of the race. This effect is greater when ballot counters are given ambiguous counting guidelines as opposed to specific instructions as to how to determine voter intent. These results have serious implications for the electoral process and recount procedures.
|
Department of Political Science
2140 Derby
Hall,154 N Oval Mall,Columbus, Ohio 43210-1373
Phone: (614) 292-2880 FAX: (614) 292-1146
Copyright ©2008,
The Ohio State University
Department of Political Science