Department of Political Science

Intranet | Office | Help Desk | Email |
Home | Welcome | Faculty Positions | Honors & Awards | Newsletter | Newsletter Archive | Contact Us |
About the Faculty | Faculty Webpages | Staff | Directory
American | Comparative | IR | Political Theory | Political Psychology | Methodology | Formal Theory | Political Economy |
Prospective Students | Graduate Handbook | Courses | Research Workshops | Webpages | Job Market Tips |
Undergraduate Programs | Courses | Archived Syllabi | Alumni
Mershon Center | ITV | John Glenn Institute | International Studies Program | Survey Research Center | Other Links

Colloquium on Positive Political Economy

The Colloquium on Positive Political Economy is a department speaker series that brings in faculty presenting cutting edge research focused on recent developments in positive political economy. These presentations are framed around: (1) the creation of formal models of political interactions, and (2) the testing of the predictions arising from these models, consistent with the recent NSF-sponsored Empirical Implications of Theoretical Models (EITM) initiative. The seminars will cut across the subfields of American Politics, Comparative Politics, and International Relations. Moreover, the topics build bridges to faculty and graduate students in the economics Department. This series complements the growing educational opportunities available to our graduate students in various game theoretic classes offered by faculty in the economics and political science departments.

2003-2004 Speakers

2004-2005 Speakers

2005-2006 Speakers

2006-2007 Speakers

2007-2008 Speakers

 

October 5th

Maggie Penn
Harvard University
Friday, October 5, 2007
2:30-4:00 PM
Spencer Room, Derby Hall

Title: " From Many, One: State representation and the construction of American national identity" (Download a copy of Professor Penn's paper)


Abstract:
I present a formal model of the effect that representation can have on the formation of group
identities using the debates over the drafting of the United States Constitution as a case study.
I first show the presence of “factions,” or groups with competing interests, to be necessary
in forging a national identity. Next, I use this model to argue that the Great Compromise
succeeded as more than a political maneuver to ensure ratification of the Constitution; it created
a political environment in which an American national identity could emerge. More generally,
I find that representation schemes that ignore group distinctions and use the individual as the
basic unit of political representation may induce individuals to embrace a group-based notion
of identity. Conversely, acknowledging group distinctions by using the group as a unit of
political representation may induce individuals to embrace a more universalistic conception of
identity, and thus may make group distinctions less salient.

 

 


Others to be announced

Please contact Professors Craig Volden (volden@polisci.sbs.ohio-state.edu) or Alan Wiseman (wiseman.69@osu.edu) for further details, or if you would be interested in speaking in the colloquium series.

The Ohio State University Department of Political Science

2140 Derby Hall
154 N. Oval Mall Columbus, OH 43210-1373
Phone: 1.614.292.2880
Fax: 1.614.292.1146

If you have trouble accessing this page and need to request an alternative format, contact webmaster@mail.polisci.ohio-state.edu.

©2007, The Ohio State University Department of Political Science